Where Mixcraft currently differs from these rivals is in its lack of support for plug–in instruments or provision of basic MIDI sequencing functionality, although these features are apparently in the works for version 4.0. Moreover - like Acid, GarageBand and Sequel - Mixcraft also aims to make working with sampled loops as easy as possible. Visually, Mixcraft 3 is reminiscent of Apple’s (Mac–only) GarageBand and Steinberg’s Sequel, both of which seem to have borrowed the same multi–pane all–in–one–window layout from Sony’s Acid. Mixcraft is available for Windows only (95, 98, ME, NT, XP, or Vista) and its system requirements are modest: a minimum of 256MB RAM, with 1GB recommended, a 1GHz CPU or better, and a display resolution of 800 x 600 (1024 x 768 or greater recommended). At just £29.99 it sits towards the ‘entry level’ end of the market, but with unlimited audio tracks, VST and Direct X effects and mix automation available, it could perhaps give one or two more expensive packages a run for their money. With unlimited audio tracks, support for VST and Direct X effects, and an intuitive interface, Acoustica’s Mixcraft offers a lot of recording potential for not a lot of money.Īcoustica’s Mixcraft presents itself as “a multitrack audio recorder that enables you to record your band, create a podcast, mash–ups or remix a song”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |